By Scripture Alone
Every day I go to work and check the schedule. The schedule tells me where to go, and when. It lets me know what I am responsible for at any given time. And, more importantly,, it lets me know what to expect in the coming hours. The schedule provides structure and security in an otherwise chaotic world. I rely on it immensely. And sometimes it is wrong.
Sola scriptura is the Latin phrase that means, “by scripture alone.” Theologically, it means that people should take a singular text, like the Bible or the Silmarallion, and base their entire lives on the words contained therein. If the text commands something, you obey without question. If the texts makes a point, you automatically agree with it. If the text doesn’t mention something, then you are probably better off ignoring it.
And why do we do everything the text says? Well, if you are asking this question you have clearly not been paying attention. We follow the text. So we do everything the text does because the text says so.
As strict as it sounds, sola scriptura does leave a little wiggle room. No matter what a document says, a person still has to interpret it. Even an audiobook has to be read out loud by someone at least once. A book cannot read itself. A book cannot write itself. A book cannot interpret itself. And different people interpret differently.
While people who believe in sola scriptura can have a lot of different interpretations of the same base text, they can never admit that the text itself is flat out wrong.
One day I went in to work, I knew I was supposed to be there. But when I loaded the schedule it said I had the day off. Had I followed the schedule, the scripture, I would have gone home without question. “Woo Hoo! The schedule Gods are smiling on me!”
But things would have gone badly if I had just left. People would have been scrambling to fill my absence. I was not on the schedule, but neither was a substitute to take my place. Following the schedule to the letter may have been good for me, but it would have been bad for many others. How good can that really be?
Some people follow scripture much more prestigious and divine than my lowly excel document, but these texts still serve the same purpose: As a guide to a good and responsible life. There is nothing wrong with following a guide. Nothing wrong with following a map.
If you are reading a map that says to cross a bridge, and the bridge was washed out twenty years ago, do you still try to cross anyway? Sola Scriptura says you do. If the truth of a text is more important than the truth of your eyes, then you will probably end up drowning.
If you are following a guide that shows you how to be good, but it commands you to exclude people or judge them harshly, what should you do? Do you do what a book says is correct, or do you do what your heart says is right?
You should never follow a person, text, or idea that compels you to do bad. Especially if that is the so-called path to glory or righteousness. Scripture is fine, but good people should trust themselves on moral matters more than they trust any book.
If you are supposed to work, then go to work, even if the schedule says otherwise.
If you are suppose to be nice and understanding to al people, then do that, even if your scripture says you shouldn’t.
If you follow scripture and scripture alone, then what is the point of having a brain? Or a heart? Or Courage for that matter.
It is good to have a guide, but you should always think for yourself.
Ha! Love it! Sola Scriptura is quite the problematic doctrine. Prima Scriptura seems to be more reasonable alternative which is the more traditional view which includes and makes alot more sense.